On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/11/2010 12:51 PM, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: >> >>> I posit an alternative suggestion: >> >> (brilliant suggestion snipped) >> >> A big +1 -- but it's a huge feature. Is it something that could happen >> for Fedora 14? >> >> I think it's big enough that it would be worth organizing a FAD for. It's >> exactly the kind of "infrastructure of participation" solution that >> requires significant investment, but drives major change. > > Agreed. I think if we had the right people in a room for a few days we > could bang out something pretty solid for F14. > I'm going to pipe in here, even though I pretty much couldn't shell script my way out of a cereal box :) and say... I can't imagine Fedora is the only community out there that struggles with these issues. Is this a project we could open up (after knocking out an initial version for F14) and share with other communities? I suppose that the code being open goes is a given - but it really would be a great way to showcase the "we are a community, and we come up with ways to improve our community, and we want to share those ways with your community" philosophy. And better yet, get those communities to come back and hang out with our community, etc. You get the picture. Not just sharing the code, but really working with others to fine-tune the process and concept, or, alternately, if it doesn't work, see what other groups are doing along the same lines. Yeah, that's my marketing cap there, yo. :D -robyn > ~spot > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board > _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
