On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In some writing he's been doing lately, Greg DeKoenigsberg has offered > this definition: A contributor is someone a community actively relies > upon for help. Someone who makes a regular contribution of some > number of edits per month would fall into this category, while someone > who only does one or two changes ever would be less like a contributor > and more like a casual participant (I think Greg called this role > "collaborator"). What is the upside of bringing on the new term "collaborator" ? Does it help us look at our participant base with more granularity or, does it go beyond that ? -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay <http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog> _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
