On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:17 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > Nope, not at all. I work on it because it interests me and I do have > hopes that others will enjoy the results just as those who put in the > effort to make it happen, but I don't have the unrealistic expectation > for the Spin(s) that I work on to take over the market share of the > prom queen. This is honestly part of why I asked the question you > quoted because if the end goal is to stop the Spins in their tracks > then I will simply move from "Spin" to "Remix" with a different logo > set as to not walk on the lines of TM issues. It makes no difference > to me, I think it would be a bit of a slap in the face to some but it > bothers me absolutely zero. I get to do what I want, contribute to > Fedora and my over all desktop experience doesn't change (I would just > miss the pretty Fedora logo). I don't get the impression that the board wants spins to stop. Far from it. What I think the board wants is to help settle vision and focus and arguments when a spin wants a package to work one way, and the default offering wants the package to work another way. In these scenarios there needs to be a default, a target to shoot for, an experience we're trying to provide in our default offering, and that needs to "win" over a spin which focuses on something else. Or at least this is one benefit to defining a target audience. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
