On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote: > >> >> What if there were spin guidelines similar to the packaging > >> >> guidelines? You want to be a spin here are the things we need ... and > >> >> this included a clear statement of the target audience of the spin. > >> >> Would having that clear statement of the target audience solve your > >> >> problems? This could be handled through FESCo oversight which seems > >> >> the more logical place for it to me and it would remove my main > >> >> concern. > >> > > >> > ... snip ... > >> > >> You would use the target audience for the default spin as the target > >> audience for that purpose. > >> > >> A secondary benefit of this in my mind is it creates a framework for > >> competition among spins to be the default spin and that competition > >> should promote technical improvements in the spins. > >> > > > > Why do you continue to pretend the default spin has a target audience? > > Please go back to the top where it says what if there were spin > guidelines that required it to have a clearly stated target audience. > If you aren't going to actually read what is being discussed there > isn't much point to participating in the discussion. > Good point, I'm out. -Mike _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
