On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, inode0 wrote: >> >> What if there were spin guidelines similar to the packaging >> >> guidelines? You want to be a spin here are the things we need ... and >> >> this included a clear statement of the target audience of the spin. >> >> Would having that clear statement of the target audience solve your >> >> problems? This could be handled through FESCo oversight which seems >> >> the more logical place for it to me and it would remove my main >> >> concern. >> > >> > ... snip ... >> >> You would use the target audience for the default spin as the target >> audience for that purpose. >> >> A secondary benefit of this in my mind is it creates a framework for >> competition among spins to be the default spin and that competition >> should promote technical improvements in the spins. >> > > Why do you continue to pretend the default spin has a target audience? Please go back to the top where it says what if there were spin guidelines that required it to have a clearly stated target audience. If you aren't going to actually read what is being discussed there isn't much point to participating in the discussion. John _______________________________________________ advisory-board mailing list advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
