On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 10:00 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I tend to think that Rawhide itself could use some rethinking -- while > keeping it open (up to some point) for radical changes, making those > changes in some unit fashion that would ensure someone could actually > install and use the system daily to a reasonable degree. It would be > ludicrous to say "No bugs allowed in Rawhide," but there's probably a > basic level of functionality we could ensure, so that it'd be more > usable for daily work and development by people who can still live > with more bugs than you'd expect in a stable release. For instance, > the system boots on certain definite sets of hardware and a VM, and > lets you login, start a web browser, and visit pre-defined web pages. This is what AutoQA aims to accomplish at the per-build testing level. We can delay builds from being tagged into rawhide if they fail some level of automated testing. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
