On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi Seth!
On 10/08/2009 05:47 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
The discussion from today has shown that we believe the spins to be a
way of fitting anyone's needs into fedora. To allowing everyone to be
involved and get what they want out of fedora. I asked this question
about the default spin being changed to xfce or kde to point out that if
our spins are equal among themselves - especially the desktop-oriented
ones - then we should choose a different default spin for a release to
see how that goes.
If, as you're saying, that the spins process is not about equals then
why do we keep pointing to it as a solution when someone wants to do
something else?
I don't think it can be both ways at the same time.
Why do you think that? If I understand correctly you're saying the spins must
be equals for the spins community to effectively serve as a place for folks
to try new/different things? I don't follow the logic.
E.g., I kind of see the spins community as a way of giving folks the freedom
to innovate and try new/different things (maybe as a proving ground at times)
without disrupting the main/default spin.
Weird. I thought Fedora was about having the freedom to innovate and try
new/different things on the leading edge.
-sv
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
