On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:44:22PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote: > Rahul Sundaram said the following on 07/17/2009 07:25 AM Pacific Time: >> On 07/17/2009 06:50 AM, John Poelstra wrote: >> >>> Have the questions in this thread been adequately addressed? If not, >>> what specific questions does the board still need to address and I'll >>> make sure they are carried forward to our queue of issues to discuss. >> >> They have not been >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-July/msg00025.html >> > > I have opened a ticket for this topic. I would propose that the trademark should be reserved for the things the Board specifically approves for release, which includes the actual release candidates for test phases up through final GA. For anything else, the Board's approval is required, and the Board should normally not entertain requests for midstream test images. This would put any community member or team that wants to release test images on a level playing field, and erases any confusion by a downstream consumer over whether something is official Fedora. The removal of fedora-{logos,release,release-notes} and substitution of generic-* presents an exceedingly low risk for regressions and any other problems. If any are found, they should be fixed in the distribution, because they are problems that exist for any potential downstream remixer. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
