On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:02 PM, John Poelstra<poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it correct to say that this issue is "closed" from a board perspective > and the remaining work/issues are the technical implementation that belongs > to the Infrastructure team? I didn't ever recall there being a board issue. In what context did this come up? We'd pretty much decided on this approach at FUDCon Boston. If the Board wants us to stand down, then we can, but if not, that's still the plan :) _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
