Greetings. I'd like some clarification from the board if possible. I'll use an example of the Xfce spin here, but this would apply to any of the approved spins. - The Xfce Spin was approved by the board to use the Fedora trademark a while ago. So it can use fedora-logos and is an 'official' spin. - If I make a rawhide Xfce spin right now with current rawhide packages that seems to fall under: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines#Distributing_Fedora_software_2 Which says: "use of the Fedora Trademarks is approved by the Fedora Board." My questions: 1. Is the approval I got a while back for the Xfce spin "good for life" ? Or does it have some expiration date on it? 2. Do I need board approval for any Xfce compose thats not made by rel-eng in an "official" capacity on fedora infrastructure? Or does the approval in 1 work for this? We want to make weekly test releases of a rawhide Xfce spin, do we need to request approval for each? 3. When changes are made to the spin kickstart, do I need to ask the Board to vet and review them and reapprove the 'new' spin? If the answer to those is that approval is needed, does using 'generic-logos' bypass that? And how much would that invalidate our testing as we are not testing the thing that will be composed and shipped. Thoughts? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
