On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:32:37AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: >On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:32:27AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:28:14AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> >On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 07:40:10AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:08:46PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >> >> >On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:28:22PM -0500, Scott Williams wrote: >> >> >> Rahul, >> >> >> >> >> >> Jesse Keating still owns fedoralegacy.org and so far has requested we >> >> >> not use that name. Tentatively looking at FedoraForever.org. We >> >> >> would like to use Fedora in the domain name since we will be packaging >> >> >> security updates explicitly for EOL Fedora versions. I have also >> >> >> looked into working under Fedora Unity, but at this time we will >> >> >> remain separate projects. >> >> > >> >> >Any reason why a separate domain name is needed? Why not something >> >> >like eol-security.fedoraproject.org for a server name, which FI can >> >> >redirect to your hosting service? >> >> >> >> Because that has the implication that it's part of the fedora project, >> >> which I don't think is the case here. At least not yet. >> > >> >Yeah, but I tend to dislike the practice of forcing a new >> >idea/subproject to have to distinguish (at a domain level) it's place >> >in the Fedora universe. Seems like it adds a lot of overhead to push >> >past the status quo. >> > >> >Can't we, with website verbage, control the message we want end users >> >to understand? If not, is another domain really going to make that >> >much of a difference in that message being understood? >> >> We could try, but people hardly ever read that stuff. My primary >> concern is getting bugs/requests for packages in the main Fedora >> bugzilla and lists for stuff that is EOL. We have an EOL for a reason. >> >> That's possible whether a new domain is created or not. I'm just >> wondering if it would exacerbate the situation even more if it was >> just a sub-domain of fp.o > >We recently purchased the "fedoracommunity.org" domain, and I think >that would be a good place to establish this effort -- in other words, >"eol.fedoracommunity.org" or some similar URL. It makes clear that >the project is part of a community effort as opposed to being part of >the official "fedoraproject.org" domain. > >I'm not going to short-circuit the discussion of the value or scope of >this project, just wanted to clarify that we do have an appropriate >domain available. Does this sound amenable? To me, yes. Thanks Paul. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
