Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:58AM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They seem reasonable for things which are aspiring to be Fedora(tm)
Spins. For those that don't want to use either of the trademarks, they're
obviously not that relevant.
Brings up an excellent question. Do they apply for just the main
Fedora trademark, or also the secondary mark? IMHO, we don't want to
be sullying the reputation of the secondary mark because we have a
sub-standard community-produced spin.
The "Fedora Remix" mark was invented precisely to avoid community
members having to go through an approval process. I made a wiki page
for easy redirection if needed:
So.. lemme throw this out again. What do folks think about the idea that
all spins in the spin-repository only carry the fedora mark. Not the
remix mark. If we did this, it would be very easy for the Spin SIG to
enforce the technical requirements.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Remix
Though I *believe*, however I'm not sure, that spins carrying the
secondary mark would be allowed to use third-party content in their
spins. Is this correct?
That's correct. The new trademark guidelines lay out the use cases
for the Fedora Remix mark:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Trademark_guidelines
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
