On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > They seem reasonable for things which are aspiring to be Fedora(tm) > Spins. For those that don't want to use either of the trademarks, they're > obviously not that relevant. Brings up an excellent question. Do they apply for just the main Fedora trademark, or also the secondary mark? IMHO, we don't want to be sullying the reputation of the secondary mark because we have a sub-standard community-produced spin. Though I *believe*, however I'm not sure, that spins carrying the secondary mark would be allowed to use third-party content in their spins. Is this correct? _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
