On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:46:58AM -0500, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > They seem reasonable for things which are aspiring to be Fedora(tm) > > Spins. For those that don't want to use either of the trademarks, they're > > obviously not that relevant. > > Brings up an excellent question. Do they apply for just the main > Fedora trademark, or also the secondary mark? IMHO, we don't want to > be sullying the reputation of the secondary mark because we have a > sub-standard community-produced spin. The "Fedora Remix" mark was invented precisely to avoid community members having to go through an approval process. I made a wiki page for easy redirection if needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Remix > Though I *believe*, however I'm not sure, that spins carrying the > secondary mark would be allowed to use third-party content in their > spins. Is this correct? That's correct. The new trademark guidelines lay out the use cases for the Fedora Remix mark: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Trademark_guidelines -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgpTAJ3XbkEFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
