On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:35 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:25 -0600, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > Might I suggest, as an alternative to punching me in the head, actually > > *commenting on the draft* as I have repeatedly requested? ;-) > > Well this sort of thing slipped my mind. But I would prefer if we had > some basic level of packages we considered essential to having something > called 'Fedora'. This is a good point. I can imagine a number of practices that we would not want to put under the Fedora name, such as turning off all security or maybe using a different package manager than yum. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
