Jon Stanley said the following on 08/02/2008 11:56 AM Pacific Time:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I could have sworn that the feature process this time around would
generate a tracking bug for each feature, which would then be attached
to the release blocker bug, providing a very easy breakdown of release
threatening bugs by feature.
Yeah, I thought so too. Whose responsibility is it to create the
tracker? The feature owner? FESCo once the feature is approved? The
Feature Wrangler at some point? I think that the problem here is that
we set down a guideline without specifying clear procedures as to how
to implement that guideline, so everyone thinks that the "other guy"
is doing it.
I agreed to create the tracking bug for features that were accepted
during the feature policy review for Fedora 10.
Just to make sure we're all on the same page....
I will create a new bug for the associated component and assign a
keyword of "Tracking" and have it block the F10Beta and F10 Blocker?
Does this make sense?
John
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
