On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 15:23 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 14:56 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I could have sworn that the feature process this time around would > > > generate a tracking bug for each feature, which would then be attached > > > to the release blocker bug, providing a very easy breakdown of release > > > threatening bugs by feature. > > > > Yeah, I thought so too. Whose responsibility is it to create the > > tracker? The feature owner? FESCo once the feature is approved? The > > Feature Wrangler at some point? I think that the problem here is that > > we set down a guideline without specifying clear procedures as to how > > to implement that guideline, so everyone thinks that the "other guy" > > is doing it. > > The Feature Wrangler (John Poelstra) is supposed to do it upon Feature > approval by FESCo. IIRC, John is on vacation. There is no problem that > needs fixing, other than perhaps having a backup for John which is > something that should probably happen anyway. I did email John about this -- and yes, he has been on vacation. I'll help him get the bugs up to date next week, seeing as how I have a vested interest in the feature progression. At the same time, we'll make it clearer who's got John's back in the future. :-) -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
