On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> That's why RH has appointed seats. So if they aren't appointing people >> to lookout for their business interests, there's not much Fedora can do >> about it... > > So our choices now are appoint yet another @redhat.com person which will > make the community complain louder (can we say 7-2?), or appoint someone > from the community which will not represent Red Hat's interests. Both > options have pretty bad downsides for Red Hat. We're trying to both play > nice with the community by giving them a say, and protect our interests. > Which is probably not completely possible this time around.... To the contrary. Perhaps the voters have decided that Red Hat has been doing an awesome job. I don't get where the big deal is. -Yaakov _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
