On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 16:51 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 4:45 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is not an unfair point. Being able to spend all your time on > > something does make it more likely you'll be well known. I mentioned > > this before but I'd be in favor of consecutive term limits for being on > > the fedora board for rh employees tasked with working on fedora full > > time. > > > > so, for example, I could not run for another term, but I could sit out a > > couple of terms and come back if I wished to run for election, again. > > > > What would you think about that? > > I'd be happy to have a term limit even as a non-rh employee. > I'm very much for term limits, and I feel strongly that it should be a general thing, not specific to any one person due to one's employment at the time. Trying to bias it on ones employment just becomes too difficult, especially given the case that one could be a Red Hat employee in a completely different part of the organization, yet still spend one's free time on Fedora. Or in people's cases like mine, I'm paid by Red Hat, with the basic mandate of "Go forth and make Fedora successful, as defined by Fedora". I tell RH what I'm doing, not the other way around. I'm accountable to the Fedora community, and if at any time the Fedora community looses their confidence in me, then my paycheck would be in jeopardy. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
