On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Bryan Che <bche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not saying that we should use "@home" as I understand the IP > > implications. But, there is a spectrum of names from cool/clever like > > "Trellis," (which is how we often name open source projects) to > > something meaningful but boring like "Fedora Open Community Grid > > Project." We would need to market both--and anything in between--but > > less cool and clever is easier to market, at the expense of being, well, > > less cool and clever. > > Tsk Tsk, this isn't constructive brain storming... telling me its too > cool and clever a name is flattering, but you have to pony up a > counter suggestion or your just naysaying. Throw out something in > between the boring and clever and fill in the spectrum a little bit > with another possibility. > > > The Fedora Trellis: The Open Community Grid..... > Supporting a garden of innovation and ideas through community collaboration. > > -jef"How is that not marketable?"spaleta > u!fedora -- u factor fedora fedora^u -- fedora to the power of you Calc U & US Taken ones: uPowered ufinity youfinity upower -- ubuntu version -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
