On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Bryan Che <bche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not saying that we should use "@home" as I understand the IP > implications. But, there is a spectrum of names from cool/clever like > "Trellis," (which is how we often name open source projects) to > something meaningful but boring like "Fedora Open Community Grid > Project." We would need to market both--and anything in between--but > less cool and clever is easier to market, at the expense of being, well, > less cool and clever. Tsk Tsk, this isn't constructive brain storming... telling me its too cool and clever a name is flattering, but you have to pony up a counter suggestion or your just naysaying. Throw out something in between the boring and clever and fill in the spectrum a little bit with another possibility. The Fedora Trellis: The Open Community Grid..... Supporting a garden of innovation and ideas through community collaboration. -jef"How is that not marketable?"spaleta _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
