I've already been working on the brainstorming and name collecting part
and have also asked for input offline from people far better than me at
this as well. I'll post those suggestions back to the list to spark
discussion once I have them. I'm also not naysaying "Trellis"--just
pointing out that there are pros and cons for a type of name so that we
can make sure we consider them as we pick a name.
Bryan
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Bryan Che <bche@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not saying that we should use "@home" as I understand the IP
implications. But, there is a spectrum of names from cool/clever like
"Trellis," (which is how we often name open source projects) to
something meaningful but boring like "Fedora Open Community Grid
Project." We would need to market both--and anything in between--but
less cool and clever is easier to market, at the expense of being, well,
less cool and clever.
Tsk Tsk, this isn't constructive brain storming... telling me its too
cool and clever a name is flattering, but you have to pony up a
counter suggestion or your just naysaying. Throw out something in
between the boring and clever and fill in the spectrum a little bit
with another possibility.
The Fedora Trellis: The Open Community Grid.....
Supporting a garden of innovation and ideas through community collaboration.
-jef"How is that not marketable?"spaleta
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
