On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:18:14 -0900 "Jeff Spaleta" <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So here is something I want the _Board_ to decided. Do they want to > > codify what falls into the official spins category and tell rel-eng, or > > do they want to leave it up to rel-eng to suggest which spins should be > > official? IMHO, the Board should have final say in either case but the > > initial recommendation should come from rel-eng. > > I'm fine wih rel-eng making recommendations as to what is deserving > for promotion to an officially hosted location.... as long as we have > the larger category of spins that exist which the Board can grant use > the trademarks to but are not promised hosting. Not speaking for rel-eng, yes I think we agree here. Now, that's just you and I agreeing to agree on agreeing. I think we need the Board as an entity and rel-eng as an entity to agree with our agreement before it becomes one of those mythical "decisions". > What I would think would be best here is that every release cycle, > infrastructure tells us how many spin images they can host. That > becomes the hard limit as to what we can do in that release period for > official spins. N spins for that release as a maximum. With that in > mind we take recommendations from rel-eng to fill that space up with > N-1 spins, with a mandate of making choices based primarily on quality > and diversity. The board then rubber stamps those selections and has > the option of including one additional spin that rel-eng really really > hates. > > Sound reasonable? That does sound reasonable. It also sounds like it falls right in line with Paul's "Making releases snap" crusade. Hopefully others will speak up. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
