On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:16:15 -0500 (EST) Max Spevack <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If there are a whole bunch of spins that are hosted in non-official > places, and tested by the same communities of people that create > them, then that is also fine with me. > > No one will *force* Fedora RelEng, QA, or Infrastructure to take on > any work they don't want. Similarly, no one should tell the > tinkerers to stop playing or slow down. That last thing is the > *worst possible action* that could be taken. I agree to an extent. My major concern is that we have... uncontrolled innovation happening (which is great!) but the Fedora name and brand is being attached to it, and we have no differentiation between something the Fedora team has put out as a release through QA/Releng/Fedora community testing/etc... and something somebody cooked up in the backroom and threw over the wall. I would want it to be clear that somebody is consuming a "contrib" creation rather than a blessed spin. And no, I don't really have any good ideas on how to make that distinction outside of a second mark. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
