On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:44:42 -0500 (EST) Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sigh. > > Haven't we been through this before? > > My understanding was that no distro, derived from All Fedora Bits > (tm) or not, could not bear the Official Fedora Name unless it was > blessed by the board. Which probably implies blessed by QA and > releng. Did I misunderstand the policy? Has policy changed, and I'm > unaware of it? Sortof. It seems that Max wants to empower folks in areas to create and share things called Fedora without going through releng / QA because releng / QA resources are finite. I tend to want this too, but in a way that the product is labeled as contrib and not official Fedora. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
