On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 15:44 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > Haven't we been through this before? See, I thought so too. Yet the fact that this keeps coming up says to me that either we didn't or the people who did are no longer on the Board and the memory didn't "institutionalize". > My understanding was that no distro, derived from All Fedora Bits (tm) or > not, could not bear the Official Fedora Name unless it was blessed by the > board. Which probably implies blessed by QA and releng. Did I > misunderstand the policy? Has policy changed, and I'm unaware of it? That's what I understood as well. > But really, this is also about the Brand (tm). And I'm still not clear > that we have a handle on what the Brand (tm) entails. > > So perhaps we should have a restatement from The Board about policies > regarding The Brand. Exactly and worded much better than the few mails I've tried to write today and continuously failed with. Jeremy _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
