On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:03:38PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Are all packagers/contributors subscribed to fedora-devel-announce? > > Is subscription mandatory? It should, as well as ... > > IMO, the recent blow-up of rawhide has shown once more that a way to > > send memos to all contributors (in this case "packagers") is needed. > > Some commits to packages say "Rebuild for new glibc ABI" which clearly > > is based on misunderstanding the wrong broken deps notifications. I this > > case, an early memo would have saved packagers from preparing > > unneeded rebuilds. > > > > Thoughts? > > I have similar problems when sending outage notifications. When I have a > message to get out to the community, where do I send it? In the case of > outages it affects art, docs, websites, etc teams. But the plain old > Fedora-announce list doesn't seem quite right (its more for end user > communication I think). ... Fedora artists, documenters, webmasters etc. Or paraphrased: Everything not end-user consumable should go to fedora-devel-announce and everyone involved with Fedora more than as an end user should be subscribed there. The alternative of creating new *-announce lists will add to the list inflation problem. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpzIorKOsTt8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
