Re: Mandatory subscriptions to a memo-list?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> Are all packagers/contributors subscribed to fedora-devel-announce?
> Is subscription mandatory?
>
> IMO, the recent blow-up of rawhide has shown once more that a way to
> send memos to all contributors (in this case "packagers") is needed.
> Some commits to packages say "Rebuild for new glibc ABI" which clearly
> is based on misunderstanding the wrong broken deps notifications. I this
> case, an early memo would have saved packagers from preparing
> unneeded rebuilds.
>
> Thoughts?

I have similar problems when sending outage notifications.  When I have a
message to get out to the community, where do I send it?  In the case of
outages it affects art, docs, websites, etc teams.  But the plain old
Fedora-announce list doesn't seem quite right (its more for end user
communication I think).

	-Mike

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux