On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:05:40 +0530 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>>> "RS" == Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > RS> The fact that bugz.fp.o is separate instead of being part of > > RS> bugzilla to me, indicates that we have a problem. > > > > I'm having trouble understanding how a quick interface to a few set > > queries is a problem. Surely it's a good thing that bugzilla lets us > > do this. > > Enhancements like this should be part of bugzilla and not a separate > interface. http://bugzilla.redhat.com/rpm can be modified to do this. > The reason why we don't it is because pretty much nobody in Fedora has > access to that bugzilla instance to make improvements that benefit Fedora. That's not specific to bugzilla and generally will not change unless Fedora does not use Red Hat IS. Frankly, I don't see a problem. It's an enhancement that Fedora can control, while still reaping the benefits of using the Red Hat bugzilla instance. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
