On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 16:11 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > One problem with this is that there tend to be a fair number of > > duplicate bugs filed. So fifty people triaging one bug a piece means > > that they don't catch those duplicates and treat them as such. Instead, > > they seem them as fifty separate bug reports. > > > > One big and important part of triaging is looking at the patterns which > > appear when you look at larger numbers of bugs. Both from the point of > > view of effectively handling issues as well as from the perspective of > > being able to provide information to developers as to what areas need > > work > > Yep. I agree with the divide-and-conquer sentiment, but see more value in > dividing and conquering components. Like, say, have a person or a group > who handle triaging NetworkManager bugs. Establish areas of strength, and > then expand from there. also worth noting for future reference - while bugzilla is a fine interface (sort of) this is really easy for looking at bugs which are /new/needinfo/etc: http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/[name-of-package] -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
