Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:43:54 +0100
Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
GPLv2 doesn't say though that once the binary is released originally,
the clock starts ticking all over again each time it is redistributed
by a third party that uses 3c. A written offer can easily contain a
time frame consistent with the three years described in the license,
possibly extended to 3 years + a release's lifecycle.
That's your interpretation. Are you a lawyer?
You on the other hand are fearing the exact opposite so much you
wouldn't let anyone dig into it -"Please avoid at all costs". Now, tell
me, are you a lawyer, Mr. Keating? Don't try and make this about me,
attack my opinion with arguments, please. Last time I checked we share a
common goal here -a greater good if you will.
Haven't I requested -since you think it is so dangerous- to determine
what it is it says we can or cannot do?
-Jeroen
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
