On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:20:16 -0500 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hm, interesting question. > > In the past, when I've done 'Fedora X + stuff' releases, such as the > spins I've done for newly-supported hardware like Pegasos and PS3, > I've shipped the install tree with an SRPMS/ directory containing the > two or three packages which I had to update. Would that be a > reasonable answer? I answered this in person with David today. When a secondary arch does a release that would match up to a primary release (like "9"), The secondary arch has a full srpm tree (since hardlinks are cheap right?). When we shuffle this into the mirror system, hardlinks will be made, and just the few differences will show up. New repodata will have to be made, but we can accomplish that. Thoughts? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
