On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 12:58 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Clarify for me one thing. Assuming you slip relative to x86 release > date and you need to use f9-updates packages... what are we doing with > respect to ensuring source distribution? Will you be rolling srpm > isos that match the binary isos? We don't make any effort to keep > srpms nor binaries for updates available for the full lifetime of a > release. So i just want to make sure we know what we are doing for > secondary arches to meet source distribution requirements. Hm, interesting question. In the past, when I've done 'Fedora X + stuff' releases, such as the spins I've done for newly-supported hardware like Pegasos and PS3, I've shipped the install tree with an SRPMS/ directory containing the two or three packages which I had to update. Would that be a reasonable answer? Of course, my preferred answer is just not to slip :) -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
