On Nov 12, 2007 3:20 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In the past, when I've done 'Fedora X + stuff' releases, such as the > spins I've done for newly-supported hardware like Pegasos and PS3, I've > shipped the install tree with an SRPMS/ directory containing the two or > three packages which I had to update. Would that be a reasonable answer? Its a sufficient answer, not sure if I can reasonably answer whether its reasonable. > Of course, my preferred answer is just not to slip :) I think you should find as many ways as possible to gunk up the secondary arch workflow process now, so we can establish precedents on how to handle different problems so the sparc people don't get to. -jef"really really hates debugging code where making an unsigned integer too small makes things go crazy, especially when the new too small value use to work"spaleta _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
