On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:38:57 +0200 Jeroen van Meeuwen <kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You're saying the board decided to push Revisor into the > "Kadischi"-corner?? > > I'd love to hear what arguments were considered. Not the same situation at all. However we have a set of tools that Release Engineering uses to produce the Fedora distributions. These tools are where all development necessary for the release happens, and often it is quite rapid. We have these codebases to concern ourselves with when addressing changes in the distribution or bugs in the compose process. When it comes to making other spins for Fedora, these are the codebases we wish to be used to produce those spins. How a config file is generated doesn't really matter, so long as the file is valid. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
