On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 12:58 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > So I could I could use revisor and make a distribution and call it > the Livestock Insemination Operating System (LIOS), a Fedora Community > Derivative. > Where its clear that the primary mark is the leading mark and the > community derived mark is more in the spirit of an accreditation or > certification mark. This is therefore a different discussion, but closely related to, the "what will we allow in Fedora proper" question. Can we define a set of criteria whereby "Foo, a Fedora Community Derivative" is possible? How different is that criteria from what goes into what we mark as "Fedora"? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
