On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 14:11 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > -1: Based on Fedora with non-free, patent-encumbered-in-the-US (peitUS) > software can be called "Fedora" > 0 : Based on Fedora with non-free maybe-peitUS but distributable can be > called "Fedora" > 1 : Based on Fedora with free but peitUS can be called "Fedora" > 2 : Based on Fedora with free and maybe-peitUS but distributable can be > called "Fedora" > 3 : Based on Fedora with free and not peitUS can be called "Fedora" > > We have 3 currently. We know that -1 is already disallowed by the > standing trademark guidelines, right? Some people argue we have 0 with > firmware. What we are discussing here is, what do we want to do with 1 > and 2. Sorry, that was close but missed a level 4, which is where we are really at. 4 : Based on Fedora with free and not peitUS and in Fedora SCM can be called "Fedora" Fedora trademark guidelines -- only 4 allowed. Fedora spirit so far -- 3 and 4 allowed. Questions are about 1 and 2. We're sure we don't want 0 by itself, although we accept 0 (Fluendo) along with $something. We know -1 is not going to be called Fedora, at least in this decade. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
