On 7/20/07, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm fairly certain we *DON'T* want to do this, even if we do start pointing to a non-US repo.
Or to generalize it. How can we acknowledge the derivative work going on outside the main cvs repository as being part of a larger body of Fedora contributor effort, but still be distinctly identifiable as derivative? I very much like the fact that Dell's firmware updater livecd is derived from Fedora. I'd like there to be a clear way for the creators of that CD to choose to express that the work was made possible in large part to the work Fedora is doing and to give credit back to the community. I would like for us to be able to clearly point to that cd as a derived work, as a secondary product of our efforts, to show off what our open infrastructure makes possible and to inspire more people to look at using our infrastructure for maximal benefit. How do we do that without letting derived works with bits outside of our cvs use the Fedora mark? -jef _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
