On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 14:43 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:03 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:41 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 13:24 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > >> And let's not forget that we already "shill" for other folks... The > > > >> bittorrent-gui app features a "Donate" button. Note that I am not > > > >> saying that is a bad thing. > > > > > > > > Again, shilling is not the issue here. > > > > > > > > Helping Fluendo sell proprietary software is WELL outside of the > > > > ideology of Fedora. > > > > > > Is helping desktop users outside of the ideology of Fedora? > > > > It is if pushing proprietary software is required to do so. > > okay, let's calm down a bit. It is not such a dichotomy, I don't think. Yeah, sorry. Greg's hyperbole got me all excited. > Fluendo is AN OPTION it is not the only option. Which is why we wanted > codec buddy to work as I mentioned before. > > Spot, Josh, would either of you be upset if our page that explained what > better codecs were available and why the bad ones were bad and what it > does to our culture and software development and the fate of the world > also threw out the 'but if you still want to commit this act of heinous > evil, here are the options we are legally allowed to show you' Sure. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
