On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 21:16 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Max Spevack wrote: > > > 4) To what extent is it appropriate for hooks or other "stuff that makes > > it easier for someone to do non-free stuff like CodecBuddy" to exist in > > Fedora? We need to decide on this from a philosophical standpoint. The > > lawyers will help us with the legal standpoint. > > Note that Free software but patent encumbered is not equivalent to > non-free. The Fluendo codecs are non-free. Pointing to a third party > repository with Free software is obviously not a non-free solution. Last time I checked, the Fluendo codecs were under a BSD license. That's a free software license. ~spot _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
