On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 07:29 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > I agree this would be quite invasive, but the documenation can be > rawhide'd (rawhidden? ;) > > For example the yum config files could look like > > [rawhide] > name=Fedora - Development (rawhide) > mirrorlist=... +1 > And any mention to the development repos could be replaced by > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawHide which would be the renamed and > redirected /Development pages. Can we make it wiki/Rawhide? I hate UnNecessary CamelCase. :) > This would make a better association of the /development/... paths and > the name rawhide. Yes, let's just make it clear -- "rawhide is the permanent codename for wherever the development branch is". If you go into a CVS module, you'll find foo/FC-6, foo/F7, and foo/devel. You won't find foo/Zod, foo/Moonshine, and foo/rawhide. > All assuming we want to get the name "rawhide" back to its former > glory, because - as said - FC1 was trying to phase it out for whatever > reason (maybe someone back then thought that RHEL's internal > development tree would keep that name?). I don't know, but I always thought it was (ironically) about demystifying the development tree. It may have been "rebranding", not sure. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
