Re: governance, fesco, board, etc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:43 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:02:26PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 11:49 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 11:05:57AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > > > > > ATM, I am seeing to many "dark room" decisions taking
> > > > > > > > effect, which are not in the community's interest.
> > > > > Prominent community members have been doing (and still do) just as
> > > > > much backstage talking as RH people. Anyway this is another story.

> But fesco is not a political organ, it is an engineering group
> managing all technical issues in Fedora. The political organ is the
> board.

In FE FESCo was a democratically elected political organ, now "the
board" has taken over => FESCo is superfluous, the elections are
superfluous.

Ralf


_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux