On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 11:37 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 10:44 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: > >> that if someone wants to know more specifics, we give them the location > >> of the full EULA. > >> > >> Which, by the way, is now on the wiki: > >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/EULA > > > > Do we want to actually put this in a release specific path? The EULA > > does change from time to time and won't retroactively apply to older > > releases. So thinking ahead to that and having the URL appropriately > > versioned seems like a good idea... > > You're right. I can change it to a Fedora 7 EULA page, and we can use > #redirect to have /Licenses/EULA point to "current" For these "permanent" URLs, it is probably a good idea to start to rethink how we are defining them. I.e., "wiki" shouldn't be in the URL, and for now we should have an Apache rule that redirects fp.org/Foo to fp.org/wiki/Foo, unless /Foo otherwise exists. This is the consequence of trying to wedge the Wiki into CMS duties, it is harder to make URLs that always work. Anyway, point made here, and I should probably go tackle this on f-websites-l. We'll come to consensus and let ya'll know. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
