Re: GFDL and documentation freedom (was: Re: FS/OSS license: not quite enough of a requirement)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 21:58 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Now, I don't know whether any software in Fedora is under this
> license.  But our policies permit software under this license to be
> integrated. 

As much as I don't want to be on this thread...

Nothing in Fedora is using the Reciprocal License at this time.
Nothing in Fedora is using any _known_ non-free license at this time,
with the exception of firmware.

Alexandre, I know that you feel strongly on these issues, and I also
know that you and Rahul are likely to argue perpetually, while actually
agreeing on things.

I suggest that you guys either take it off list, or move on to proposing
drafts.

Thanks,

~spot

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux