Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 9, 2007, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Commitment is the first thing established in the guidelines
Where?
In the licensing section where it says we are only going to include
software under the FSF free software definition or OSI open source
definition. For all these we are including SRPMS so source is always
going to available to end users with the exception of firmware.
Your "Public Promise" proposal that makes it part of policy makes no
mention of firmware and hence would be inconsistent with the rest of the
guidelines.
It does not stop things like including Fleundo mp3 plugin (which is what
I think you have in mind) because we are not a patent licensee in that
case. It is under a Free software license which satisfies the definition.
> Probably not, since the FSD is about software, and documentation is
> not software, even though it's an important element for every piece of
> software.
Non-free documentation is ok to you?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
