On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:49 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III schrieb: > >>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > JK> Sure it's neat information to have, but for the sake of getting a > > JK> few people together to get some work done, I really don't want to > > JK> have to go through the headache of creating all this red tape and > > JK> governance. > > > > As far as I can tell all you really need is something that tells > > people where to look if they want to become involved in the process. > > What list should they join (if there's a list)? What IRC channel > > should they join (if there's IRC discussion)? If you decide to have > > meetings (and nothing requires that as far as I can see) then say when > > and where the meetings are held. > > > > That's about it. > > Agreed if you add a "post a summary of important decisions so the public > and FESCo (and thus the board) know what got decided" To clarify, there actually haven't been very many discussions so far. A few update requests during the freeze, and that's about it. What Bill proposed would actually _be_ the first important discussion. Everything of sufficient importance has so far been discussed in public or at least disclosed to the public shortly thereafter. Do not mistake silence for a cabal. Sometimes there just aren't any discussions going on :). josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
