>>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: JK> Sure it's neat information to have, but for the sake of getting a JK> few people together to get some work done, I really don't want to JK> have to go through the headache of creating all this red tape and JK> governance. As far as I can tell all you really need is something that tells people where to look if they want to become involved in the process. What list should they join (if there's a list)? What IRC channel should they join (if there's IRC discussion)? If you decide to have meetings (and nothing requires that as far as I can see) then say when and where the meetings are held. That's about it. It might be nice to list out the people who are currently on the team so that everyone knows who they're talking to and who to ping. But I agree that if folks are really wanting you to elect a chairman and list out the parliamentary procedure you're using then that indeed is a bit over the top and I can see why you'd object. And if you hate dealing with the wiki as much as I do, just post that info here and ask nicely and I'm sure that someone will cook up a page. - J< _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
