On Friday 13 April 2007 01:05:05 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > I'd further would like to see more informations what the Release Team is > (number of people and names), how it is constituted (approved, elected, > mixed?), who's responsible (chairmen?) and what its works areas exactly > are (what remains FESCo work and what will the Release Team take care > of? and when does the Board get into the game?). It's things like this that start to frustrate me. Sure it's neat information to have, but for the sake of getting a few people together to get some work done, I really don't want to have to go through the headache of creating all this red tape and governance. Now, I don't think that some of this is bad to have, it just makes the barrier of entry to having a group of people work on something pretty daunting. It's part of the reason why I _haven't_ yet created the sig page for the release team, thinking about this crud gives me a headache. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgptLEJa57iZu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
