Bill Nottingham schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> == Composition == >>> * Jesse Keating (f13) >>> * Josh Boyer (jwb) >>> * Bill Nottingham (notting) >>> * Jeremy Katz (katzj) >>> * [Please fill in and correct] >> I'd say the maybe the body that makes the decisions should have a >> defined size. Maybe 7 or 9 members -- that's not to much (otherwise >> nobody might feel responsible) and not to less (to much work for >> everyone). The size of the group/team/SIG itself of course is not limited. > > OK, this is where I start yelling. > > We've got a release coming up, and we need to coordinate to make sure things > get done. So a proposal is made on how to make sure the right people meet > with the right people to get things done and organized. As I indicated earlier in this thread multiple time already: I'm fine with finding a rough and easy scheme for now and sorting details like... > So, of course, it then moves to: > - discussion of meeting times > - naming of representatives suggestions of representatives > - agenda for the first meeting > - discussion of blockers > > Wait, no, *all the discussion is around GROUP SIZE and MAILING LIST NAMES*? ...out after F7. Toshio just asked for comments and I gave some. Yeah, maybe I should have kept that one out for now ;-) Sorry. > [...] CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
