Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > == Composition == > > * Jesse Keating (f13) > > * Josh Boyer (jwb) > > * Bill Nottingham (notting) > > * Jeremy Katz (katzj) > > * [Please fill in and correct] > > I'd say the maybe the body that makes the decisions should have a > defined size. Maybe 7 or 9 members -- that's not to much (otherwise > nobody might feel responsible) and not to less (to much work for > everyone). The size of the group/team/SIG itself of course is not limited. OK, this is where I start yelling. We've got a release coming up, and we need to coordinate to make sure things get done. So a proposal is made on how to make sure the right people meet with the right people to get things done and organized. So, of course, it then moves to: - discussion of meeting times - naming of representatives suggestions of representatives - agenda for the first meeting - discussion of blockers Wait, no, *all the discussion is around GROUP SIZE and MAILING LIST NAMES*? Gah. If people need people to write interminable process documents before they feel they can get involved, then we've screwed up this project so bad it's not funny. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
